Ontogenetic thinking - derivative or primordial?

Karyakin Yu.V.

Tomsk Polytechnic University

The dilemma indicated by the title is provoked by both the experience of communication in general and the experience of accessing network stores through a search engine to interpret an unfamiliar term and emphasizes the fact of the preferred provision of interpretation based on the part in the request whose probability value is higher. We get a reaction to the ONTOGENETIC THINKING request in the form of interpretations related to the most "natoptic" term ONTOGENESIS related to the topic of anthropogenesis. The search situation becomes more complicated, provoking a repeated request with an orientation towards etymology. The appearance of an additional feature only increases the search space, but the grammatical relationship between the parts is ignored. The demanded interpretation in the form of "ontogenetic thinking is a way of expressing I, included in the integrity of the world and participating in its development through interaction with it in the form of a cyclic organization of actions of two types - sensory perception and theoretical creation" is not achievable in view of its absence in the search space, there is no such information-sign construction in the search field! A network search engine is a reflection of the culture of language communication. In everyday life and other types of communication, when we meet with an unfamiliar verbal construction, we turn, first of all, to experience in order to find something similar in our memory. Ontogenetic thinking in terms of the results of its cultivation in a scientific and educational environment is a way of understanding and activity manifestation of the popularly recited idea that in the world all things are mutually connected and form an attractive and reliable integrity in the status of a guarantor of security.


© 2004 Designed by Lyceum of Informational Technologies №1533